Murray Schloss, around 1905 |
At its peak in the early 19th century, the Jewish community of Kleinsteinach-Riedbach in Lower Franconia, Bavaria, numbered about 200. There was a school, synagogue, and cemetery. Today the cemetery remains and the town is quite charming, as if nothing evil happened there in November 1938.
Seligman Schloss, born in Kleinsteinach
in 1830, immigrated to the United States in 1853. He settled in Detroit and
became a highly successful manufacturer of men’s suits; so much so that when he
died in 1914 he left an estate worth more than $1 million.
In Seligman’s will, he
singled out his youngest son, Murray, then 38 years old. Murray would receive
nothing until he turned 50, after which he would receive several $20,000 installments
until he turned 90. Seligman wrote:
His
talents, which I have ever failed to appreciate, do not run along commercial
lines, and it is on that regard that I have made the best effort within my
power to provide permanently for him.
. .
Murray was furious. He
called the terms “repulsive,” and vowed to challenge the will. Murray must have
been successful, for he left a considerable estate when he died in 1927 at age
51.
Why did the
son infuriate his father? Was Seligman angry because Murray refused to participate wholeheartedly in the family business? Did he object to Murray’s passion for revolution? Or
his rejection of Judaism in favor of John Alexander Dowie, a healer who claimed
to be a prophet and established Zion City, Illinois?
Good feelings surely
prevailed at some point, for Murray was the only Schloss child who accompanied
Seligman and his wife, Hannah, to Europe in 1895. Unlike his brothers, who
joined the firm of Schloss Brothers, Murray graduated from college. First
enrolled at the University of Michigan, Murray transferred to the University of
Chicago and graduated in 1904.
At Chicago, Murray attended
classes taught by the compelling Professor Oscar Lovell Triggs and in 1905 joined
the staff of Triggs’ magazine, To-Morrow,
as managing editor.
For a while, Murray wrote a
column entitled “To-Morrow’s Today and Yesterday,” in which he railed against
capitalism and politicians:
Revolution
is in the air. In politics only can we count the tallies; but no interest that
we humans have escapes the metamorphosis that the changing world is undergoing.
The forms that fetter, whether legal or social, that labor-saving humanity has
outgrown but not sloughed off, must go, and only by new ways of living and
thinking can we attain peace and the new life.
The high-flown rhetoric echoes
the style of numerous socialist publications that came and went in the U.S. between
1900 and 1920. The Russian Revolution fired up many a writer about the promise
of the future.
So it seems incongruous
that during this time, Murray took over a floundering Chicago magazine called Wayside Tales which featured detective
stories and photographs of theater stars. He and his business partner,
Marguerite Warren Springer, widow of a real estate mogul, advertised “Tales of
Work Play Life in All Moods, A Flavor of its Own.”
Next, he rented an office
in the Times Building in Manhattan and proposed to move Wayside Tales to New York. “Can it be possible that Chicago will
not stand for the erstwhile slumbering magazine any longer?” commented one wit.
Well,
maybe – because now Schloss is living at the National Arts Club on Gramercy
Park, N.Y.!
And now
Schloss is running for Congress on the Socialist ticket in the Third District
of New Jersey!
“Nobody knows exactly what
he does,” commented the editor of The
East Side, a society rag, about Murray in 1910.
“He is a genial university
man with a passion for the new civilization,” observed another journalist.
Then, Murray had the
honor of being insulted by H.L. Mencken, sarcastic columnist for The Baltimore Sun.
“Schloss is an amateur socialist
and culture-hound deluxe,” Mencken wrote to his friend George Jean Nathan, a
critic with whom he would found the enormously popular magazine, The American Mercury.
“The conversation ran to
poetry,” Mencken continued. “After my tenth seidel* I delivered my
well-known dithyrambic** glorification of Swinburne+
right in the face of Schloss.”
In 1916, Murray Schloss moved out to Los Angeles. The census shows his
occupation as a social worker. During the next seven years, he bought up 2,500
acres in the Inland Empire region of California, planning to create a Utopian community in an area called “Heart of the Hills.” It was said that Murray
claimed to hear voices from the “Masters” who told him to build a “Temple of
the Dawn.”
After he died in 1927, there
followed years of legal wrangling over the property before it went into a state
trust and was given to San Diego State University in 1960. The land is now part
of the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve near the ancient Indian city of
Temecula. It serves as a field station and helps to protect the Santa Margarita
River and its ecosystem.
Murray Schloss gave a great
gift to the environment. But his disappointed millionaire father, who fled
European pogroms, surely would have raised his arms and voice to say: “Utopia?
Temple of the Dawn? This is how you spent my fortune?”
*A large glass of beer.
**Spoken with fervor.
+Algernon Charles Swinburne,
a Victorian poet whose florid ballads Schloss would have despised. Mencken
himself was ambivalent about Swinburne.
See posts March 2 +
10, April 6, & June 15, 2016
https://www.throughthehourglass.com/2016/05/introducing-murray-schloss.html
Murray Schloss contested his father's will and received $162,500 after legal fees. When he died his estate was worth approximately $249,000 in cash, bonds, stocks and real estate. He left the bulk of his estate to the Murray Schloss Foundation for Hothan Pioneering to be held and administered as a charitable fund in trust and the income to be used for the Heart-o'-the-Hills and those following the taaching of the Temple or Church of the Dawn. He specifically excluded his brother Albert and sister Clara from the will except for a token of $1 each. They contested the will and eventually settled for $87,000 and some family heirlooms. While Murray's socialist's views and cult religion would have disappointed his father, apparently his financial skills were better than his father expected.
ReplyDeleteBob Kent, Independent Researcher, Menifee, Ca.